Curse of the Polymath
Jul. 18th, 2002 09:10 pmIn the reality I experience, the world is literally filled with gifted people who are not appreciated for their manifold talents. My mail these days brings me works of genius and beauty, drawn by hands that will not be seen for their immense skills by the public at large. I meet musicians installing wiring, great novelists in waiting sitting at desks (if they are fortunate) in cubicles of major corporations, and great savers-of-humanity trapped behind retail counters.
I also meet many people who are just brimming with gifts,
if only the universe were structured so that those gifts could spring forth. They do more in a weekend than I get done any month, read more novels in a month than I do in a year, and still have time to bewail the manifold shortfalls of Fate.
In general, everyone I know is more talented than their level of achievement. In general, I see more raw talent misapplied in life than I had imagined possible.
I really love the Strangers and Brothers series of novels written by CP Snow. The work is an exploration of the English professional, government and academic classes, spread across 11 novels, told through a single protagonist narrator. During the novels which touch on scientists--Snow himself started as a scientist--a recurring plot theme is "which are the truly inventive minds and which are the 'second raters'". Characters' egos rise and fall based on whether they are truly gifted (Snow, though not religious,
speaks of this almost as though it were Providence), or merely "second raters".
I have discovered over time that I am among the "second rate" intellects. I did not have the genius to be a scientist. I did not have the gifts to be a writer or artist or painter. I am a hobbyist in creative expression, not a real rabbit, perhaps not even a velveteen rabbit. I was mediocre, but not awful at sports. I can live in an ordinary home, in a non-bohemian area, and partake of cable TV without guilt. I can read at the middlebrow and the low as well as the high. I am an above-middling chess player, though chess was once a passion for me. I do well as a lawyer, but isn't law almost by definition a place for people like me?
I do not say this with any particular self-pity or longing.
I find that being a "second rate" mind is a fairly workable arrangement. For one thing, one does not worry about the fact that one has not arisen to one's fated level in life. Fortunately, one is just about where one should be in life. One does not worry that one wants to find practical solutions to problems, as one knows one is not gifted, and instead must rely on workaday solutions. My IQ tests always come out just above average--caution, non-genius at work!
I always think of that anguished character in the film Interiors, who had the soul of an artist, but none of the talent. What an agony! But I would much prefer to the person with the soul of a non-artist, and no talent. I have to think that folks who staff soup lines have no talent. I like to think that talentless people start businesses, work a little harder because they know they have to do and not depend on their gifts, and do not satisfy themselves with just being a cut above the rest.
I love the film Weapons of the Spirit, a documentary about a small town of French Protestants who sheltered a large number of Jews from the Nazis. They had no plan or genius or saintliness. They did it because they could not imagine doing otherwise. I wish I were this sort of second-rate mind; I strive to be of such limited gifts that I do the right thing automatically, being too second rate to do anything else.
Despite my ironic tone here, I have a fairly non-satiric point to make. I feel that too often we shortchange ourselves when we dream instead of giving ourselves permission to do. It's no accident that a B movie character like Ronald Reagan could imagine he could become President. His talents were so limited he could not imagine being unqualified for the role. I am not a Reagan admirer,
but I have to wonder how many of us should give ourselves permission to strive for things, even if we fear we are second-rate. In this respect, positive thinking is all well and good, but I'm in favor of positive action--one really does "Climb Ev'ry Mountain" better with hiking shoes than with an operatic voice.
My father, with whom I share some similarities, used to console me..."Bob", he'd say, "you and I are polymaths. We're not much good at anything,but we can do a little of everything". He meant we knew a little of everything, but also that we were not much good at any one thing. He could tell it much better than I do, but the story essentially meant that being no good at anything, but a little good at everything was some family coat of arms--I'll metaphorically call it a crest with 3 ordinary looking goats on it, busily grazing. Actually, my family surname is an Old English phrase, which means "Nun's Meadow". It refers to the chap who tends the garden for the convent. To me, it is the essence of my family tradition--unremarkable people who do quirky little jobs as if that were their Fate.
I must resign myself, I suppose, to what I called in an earlier post "the problem of mediocrity". But I take this comfort--because I know I am no good at anything, fear of failure rarely informs my actions. I try business, I try the arts, I try recreation--heck, I even try to overcome my shyness and relate to people. Why? Because I know I am no good at it, any of it. Even at law, which comes naturally to me, I use my gifts to solve problems more than to try to prove I am Clarence Darrow. It's no accident that I hold a degree in physics though I am nearly as calculus-impaired as any science person can be (let's skip over Cal III in college, and my grade there). I used to imagine it was a shortcoming, but now I see it as one more colorful thread in the great quilt of second-rate polymathism. It's a red badge of courage, for the talentless.
You see, I have turned my impairment into my strength.
I was not afraid to start my business, because as a polymath I knew I had no genius for it, and would have to work it, budgeting and getting clients. I didn't mind publishing my own booklet, and selling it shamelessly on ebay, because I knew I am never to grace academia or the salons of the literati, and could just huckster and market (archaic expression, but you get the idea). I can give myself permission to be bad, because I know on some level I am not really very good. The liberation from self-judgment can be very gratifying. When I send an "artwork" out in a nervousness.org exchange, I cheerfully warn the recipient how bad it is. They seem to appreciate it.
Being a polymath is a curse. I will never be anyone, anything. But it's a curse with compensation. I will not live in fear of talent squandered, opportunity lost. I will live in the moment, drawing my meager bow back to shoot my lightweight arrows. But you know, those lightweight arrows sometimes land, and unshot arrows never do.
Polymaths didn't get a line in the Sermon on the Mount, but I fancy sometimes that blessed are the polymaths, because they just don't know any better. I will count that as one more blessing, as the song says, instead of sheep.
no subject
Date: 2002-07-18 09:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-07-18 09:19 pm (UTC)that picture of my volvo was taken after i had spent approx. 6 hours detailing it myself...which included a compound buffing...then waxing...two engine cleanings, and a complete interior cleaning. it was a lot of work...but i have managed to keep it pretty much the same with regular washings and a few more waxings since.
no subject
Date: 2002-07-18 09:34 pm (UTC)I had a chance with 7 seconds left to bid, but I refrained.
It was priced only okay, anyway, so it's no great loss.
I would have thought July would be an odd time to sell an art book, when in just a coupla months xmas shoppers will be on in droves, but I'm not psychic about sales philosophy.
That Volvo is impressive, and self-detailing even more so.
no subject
Date: 2002-07-18 09:43 pm (UTC)i have NEVER cleaned a car like that...but i knew it was a diamond in the rough, especially with only 70,000 miles on it...but it was literally used on a FARM!!!
no subject
Date: 2002-07-18 09:04 pm (UTC)you are NOT mediocre. you are a special person caught in a culture of mediocrity...at least that is my humble opinion, i don't care what you got in calculus III. chin up!!!
no subject
Date: 2002-07-18 10:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-07-19 03:12 am (UTC)It might also be stated "the less I think about how good I am, the more that I can do".
no subject
Date: 2002-07-19 11:05 am (UTC)i admire my artist friend Cheryl, who has this magnificent ability
i have to apply effort to untie the knot
it would seem to be an advantage in whatever form one's creativity ie. work manifests
no subject
Date: 2002-07-19 12:44 pm (UTC)Your friend sounds much more enlightened on this score.
No matter what one does, the ability to lose that self-critical eye once in a while seems to me good, too.
Re:
Date: 2002-07-19 01:00 pm (UTC)plus, i see you're in an exchange with the wonderful Annie Bodelier of the Netherlands, she's grand, too
no subject
Date: 2002-07-19 04:31 pm (UTC)Greetz, Gurdonark
Re:
Date: 2002-07-19 08:33 pm (UTC)Good company
Date: 2002-07-19 12:26 am (UTC)Shortly after reading this lovely piece, I found myself being guided to the article containing the excerpt above by a fellow Shakespeare fan, and wanted to take this opportunity to point out what good company you're in. <grin>
Re: Good company
Date: 2002-07-19 03:10 am (UTC)I have always liked Marlowe. There's something about a couple of the speeches in Dr. Faustus that has always appealed to me.
Thanks for pointing out the similar "trait".
no subject
Date: 2002-07-19 06:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-07-19 06:49 am (UTC)I used to have to budget a phone call no more than every few months to tap into his stream of thought-provoking consciousness; now I can do it daily. Technology is good.
no subject
Date: 2002-07-19 07:16 am (UTC)I was curious, though--do you find me much different on LJ than all the other discussions we've had?
Re:
Date: 2002-07-19 09:02 am (UTC)I email a lot of folks and some of them are quite different in writing than in person though. Interesting.
no subject
Date: 2002-07-19 09:17 am (UTC)In general, I take on line as its own thing.
It's interesting, though, to LJ or e mail with longtime friends.....I find it fascinating.
no subject
Date: 2002-07-19 07:09 am (UTC)I don't claim to be particularly well put together.
I make so many mistakes, and the inside of my car
looks like Hiroshima. But this post is "going" to the place about accepting limitations, albeit it was a bit too self-laudatory to quite get there.
Re:
Date: 2002-07-19 07:27 am (UTC)you seem quite well put together, if you ask me. And like Greg, I'm envious of that.
no subject
Date: 2002-07-19 06:25 am (UTC)But "Nun's Meadow." How lovely.
no subject
Date: 2002-07-19 07:12 am (UTC)I love that movie Say Anything. It sets up all these expectations for what the character conflict in the movie is, and then shows that every expectation was entirely the opposite of the true situation.
I think we all feel a bit like John Cusack in that movie sometimes--without Ione Skye in the picture, quite, of course.
Re:
Date: 2002-07-19 07:53 am (UTC)Word.
Well....
Date: 2002-07-19 08:02 am (UTC)What are you doing now then? You are writing ~beautifully. Everyone can be those things if they want. It's not a matter of 'gifts' per se. It's the old 99% perspiration and 1% inspiration. What you put in - is what you get out :)
Re: Well....
Date: 2002-07-19 09:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-07-19 10:52 am (UTC)again your level of self-awareness is exemplary and your human condition a wonderful tale to read
i like that we ask no miracles of each other, just simply a heart and an ear
and you have both in good measure
no subject
Date: 2002-07-19 04:37 pm (UTC)Thanks for the kind words.