colorado on line, fury in the ether
Jun. 26th, 2002 02:20 pmOn the plane, one of the flight magazines was in Spanish. I muddled my way through a great article on travel to the Dominican Republic, yet another of the eighty five countries I'd love to visit but will only see through print and Discovery Channel. I am glad the word for park is parque and so forth, so that I can actually get a good idea of what I read in Spanish.
Somehow I assumed that as we flew near Denver, one would be able to look out a window and see a huge plume of forest fire smoke. That did not seem to be the case today, though. Here, it is very dry. Except for a few flowers, the hillsides look baked.
Business travel to downtown Denver is so easy. One can walk or mass transit everywhere, there are places to eat, during daylight hours there's no "weirdness", and there are copy shops and bookstores, my two travel essentials. I was amused by the fact that I remember virtually no Denver landmark from my last trip here, other than the location of the really good bookstore downtown. Other matters beckon first, however.
I'd like to come to Denver with some time to really visit some day, but this trip is another "fly out tomorrow when my meeting is done" day. Perhaps I will get a few moments outdoors late this afternoon, though, and enjoy a somewhat cooler climate than the Dallas I left.
The revelation that Worldcomm materially misstated earnings is devastating news for our economy. I feel as though the "culture war" that the "powers that be" in the House of Representatives proclaimed a few years ago is indeed in session. The problem is that I'm on the other, left side. You know, the side that spends less time trying to regulate other peoples' personal lives and more time regulating the integrity of financial statements. The very same people who are the first to pontificate about moral decline are also the first to play fast and loose with financial reporting. Somehow in our marketplace we've let financial folks forget that consequences attach to things you use to raise money from pensioners and working people. I am so bored of profit over integrity, and so bored of a regulatory climate in which genuine reporting is subordinated to "safe harbors" and "technical interpretations" which mask the true finances of a company. I haven't read much about this latest one, though, but knowing not to treat an expense as a capital investment is far from rocket science. Worldcomm already looked like it had few clothes, but now the mannequin is out of gown. The wires beneath aren't pretty.
As we watch the Dow edge down toward x,000, I hope the Republicans finally realize that an unfettered marketplace without proper regulation for investor protection will defeat the ability for anyone to raise major capital for anything. We'll all be hoist, on another misplaced right wing petard, i.e., the notion that unregulated markets are always good.
We got the Securities and Exchange Commission and the state blue sky laws during the Great Depression for a reason. The speculators had driven the economy into ruin. Now we have the apparatus in place, but it is still reactive and ham-fisted and lobbyist-beset. You can't run an economy when folks treat 3.8 billion dollars of expenses as "capital items" for the purpose showing a profit. I don't know what intent went into it all, so I'm not going to proclaim "fraud" as my internet news service today did. But I do know that we're going to have to move beyond this "cook the books to show a profit to get an executive bonus" mentality, or we are going to have an investment market in ruins. As for the auditors, words do not suffice. The thing literally speaks for itself, and it speaks volumes. But I see they've already got excuses, in a prompt press release. In this world folks don't think you have to "own up" if you can draft a good press release and hire a good attorney. But there comes a reckoning, and I am afraid all Wall Street will feel it.
Somehow I assumed that as we flew near Denver, one would be able to look out a window and see a huge plume of forest fire smoke. That did not seem to be the case today, though. Here, it is very dry. Except for a few flowers, the hillsides look baked.
Business travel to downtown Denver is so easy. One can walk or mass transit everywhere, there are places to eat, during daylight hours there's no "weirdness", and there are copy shops and bookstores, my two travel essentials. I was amused by the fact that I remember virtually no Denver landmark from my last trip here, other than the location of the really good bookstore downtown. Other matters beckon first, however.
I'd like to come to Denver with some time to really visit some day, but this trip is another "fly out tomorrow when my meeting is done" day. Perhaps I will get a few moments outdoors late this afternoon, though, and enjoy a somewhat cooler climate than the Dallas I left.
The revelation that Worldcomm materially misstated earnings is devastating news for our economy. I feel as though the "culture war" that the "powers that be" in the House of Representatives proclaimed a few years ago is indeed in session. The problem is that I'm on the other, left side. You know, the side that spends less time trying to regulate other peoples' personal lives and more time regulating the integrity of financial statements. The very same people who are the first to pontificate about moral decline are also the first to play fast and loose with financial reporting. Somehow in our marketplace we've let financial folks forget that consequences attach to things you use to raise money from pensioners and working people. I am so bored of profit over integrity, and so bored of a regulatory climate in which genuine reporting is subordinated to "safe harbors" and "technical interpretations" which mask the true finances of a company. I haven't read much about this latest one, though, but knowing not to treat an expense as a capital investment is far from rocket science. Worldcomm already looked like it had few clothes, but now the mannequin is out of gown. The wires beneath aren't pretty.
As we watch the Dow edge down toward x,000, I hope the Republicans finally realize that an unfettered marketplace without proper regulation for investor protection will defeat the ability for anyone to raise major capital for anything. We'll all be hoist, on another misplaced right wing petard, i.e., the notion that unregulated markets are always good.
We got the Securities and Exchange Commission and the state blue sky laws during the Great Depression for a reason. The speculators had driven the economy into ruin. Now we have the apparatus in place, but it is still reactive and ham-fisted and lobbyist-beset. You can't run an economy when folks treat 3.8 billion dollars of expenses as "capital items" for the purpose showing a profit. I don't know what intent went into it all, so I'm not going to proclaim "fraud" as my internet news service today did. But I do know that we're going to have to move beyond this "cook the books to show a profit to get an executive bonus" mentality, or we are going to have an investment market in ruins. As for the auditors, words do not suffice. The thing literally speaks for itself, and it speaks volumes. But I see they've already got excuses, in a prompt press release. In this world folks don't think you have to "own up" if you can draft a good press release and hire a good attorney. But there comes a reckoning, and I am afraid all Wall Street will feel it.
no subject
Date: 2002-06-26 01:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-06-26 02:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-06-27 05:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-06-28 08:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-06-26 02:23 pm (UTC)They'll never realize that as long as THEY'VE gotten out while the getting was good! It's all just *me and mine* to them.
no subject
Date: 2002-06-26 02:43 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2002-06-26 04:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-06-26 03:26 pm (UTC)it really concerns me that people sit around and buy into that right-wing b.s. promulgated through the "corporate owned, feel good" media and essentially take THEMSELVES out of the system via apathy and inability to understand the significance of the issues and turn into spectators while rome burns. this is a SERIOUS problem and america had better WAKE-UP!!! you're day of "reckoning" is on the horizon, mark my words.
all I want is honesty and well regulated markets
Date: 2002-06-26 03:34 pm (UTC)Bush campaigned on investor protection, but the Bush SEC seemed to not understand at all until Global Crossing and Enron. Now as we watch our markets recede, and capital flees like crazy, now maybe they'll get it.
Meanwhile, the G8 folks sit and gloat on bringing unregulated markets to the third world. Our best and brightest post in one of my LJ forums that the solution is to go to Calgary and break windows. Sigh.
It's hard to be a "real world" lefty some days.
it ain't hard, it's just lonely
Date: 2002-06-26 03:54 pm (UTC)i do like the idea of non-participation and it does give one a clear conscience. the extent of their greed is based upon consumerism and if we consume less then we have some impact.
what really is disheartening are the thousands of hard working people who trusted that THEIR retirement money was safe. i personally know people devastated by learning they had to retire and could not retire.
let them play their monopoly game with their own monopoly money, they will have none of mine
and as for the media playing into their hands, now that all major networks are owned by major corporations what can you expect? watch and listen to NPR and see the invasion even there
read non mainstream rags and websites like http://www.buzzflash.com/ and participate in local activists groups. ours are centralized through http://activistsandiego.org/
one simple act makes you an activist
remember the ripple effect?
Re: it ain't hard, it's just lonely
Date: 2002-06-26 04:04 pm (UTC)we're going to have this sort of thing over and over, regardless of our economic model. I've noticed, as have you, how even NPR is starting to show a corporate tilt. I am unhappy with even the "left" media such as Pacifica, because it, too, has
ideological influences which I consider undemocratic and non-egalitarian. The conventional right, the conventional left and the mainstream all disenchant right now.
I think that we've brought this fellow/lass to the dance and have to dance with him/her, i.e., we're not going to remake our economy overnight, and may not want to.
But I do think that we've got to bring integrity back to it, or we won't have it anymore.
It's not just an "illegality" thing, either. I heard some drug company lobbyist defending radically above-inflation markups of "old line" products. He said "they work, people pay, it must be okay". Did he forget that we GIVE his company that patent? Patents are not in the Bible or Koran. We actually encourage obscene profits for intellectual property, which has its upsides. But when a company lacks the conscience to treat pensioners paying for their own medication as something other than a new "gouging" center, and then dispatch lobbyists to pontificate on NPR stations, I get irritated. Don't get me wrong--I'm pro capitalism. I'm just also pro conscience.
Although you and I have different points of view, it may come to the same thing.
if we do not get integrity back into financial markets, we'll all have to invest in
"real things" instead anyway.
Re: it ain't hard, it's just lonely
Date: 2002-06-26 04:11 pm (UTC)and yes i am a socialist in the wrong country again
i like that you give my something to think about and the sense that i am not alone in my concern and outrage
urk! this simpleton doth say!
Date: 2002-06-26 07:02 pm (UTC)BUT! I DID live in Denver for 22 years and loved EVERY minute of it. I can completely understand how you would be drawn to explore it. I never got tired of its trees and mountains and rivers and plateaus or its concrete and people and man-made structures that housed much of my adolescent growth. I was born in Monterey, CA and I often say that I have the sea in my soul and the mountains in my mind.
=) Very enjoyable post for me because, while I admit ignorance, I still yearn for enlightenment.
Re: urk! this simpleton doth say!
Date: 2002-06-27 05:01 am (UTC)