Dec. 19th, 2002

edit entry

Dec. 19th, 2002 02:00 pm
gurdonark: (Default)
Although the hoopla about the release of the movie The Two Towers makes this coincidence seem like synchronicity, lately I've been reading the boxed set of books which Tolkien's son Christopher put together, which show one numerous rough drafts of The Lord of the Rings. I read the Lord of the Rings several times a year, so this interests me.

It's a fascinating look at how a complexly plotted fantasy novel came together (plus, it provides one with a storehouse of geek trivia, such as "did you know Frodo's original name was 'Bingo'?"). But it confirms one of my deepest, darkest fears about writing fiction. It is not enough to merely write a fun first draft. The devoted writer must then revise and polish. It's like a job, only more work. I had always heard rumours this was true, but the manifold plot gyrations of these Tolkien rough drafts indicate to me that it is much more work to be a novelist than it is to be an attorney.

I should not be surprised, because legal briefs require myriad revisions, though they are easier in some ways than creative writing. For that matter, journal entries require me to hit the "edit entry" key incessantly, even though as a matter of respect for the immediacy of the moment I rarely edit content (or, as seems to be readily apparent, length).

So I guess I will have to do more editing to my novel than merely hitting "spell check". I think I remember why I frequently write bad free verse of twenty lines or less. That requires minor revision, but is not time-consuming.

Maybe the immediacy of my creative writing is what I like. After all, to change slightly the old joke about whom I wish to please, I write to amuse myself. I am a human ouija board, and the pointer keeps spelling out words other than "revise" and "edit".
gurdonark: (Default)
I tend to resist learning anything practical. I am much more apt to memorize trivia about faiths in which I do not believe than I am to learn how to make my DVD player work. Therefore, I have always hitherto used "low tech" questions in lieu of the LJ poll mechanisms. But tonight I realized that I wished to try my hand at a poll. I have set the poll so that anyone can play, but that only I can see the answers (assuming I have done it correctly). I keep anonymous comments enabled, so I do not believe one has to be an LJ user to fill out the poll. Nobody has to feel bashful, as I know it is an irritation sometimes to answer open-ended questions in public.

As with all such polls, I ask a series of questions primarily for my own sense of fun. I am sorry that I was not able to generate a quiz which might tell the reader whether s/he is really Lerner & Loeb, Leopold & Loeb or Siegried & Roy, but we must take our steps into a new era one step at a time. In any event, here is my simple poll, in which I hope to discover information to enhance my LJ experience:

[Poll #85409]

Many thanks, in advance, for allowing me to know you a bit better.

Profile

gurdonark: (Default)
gurdonark

June 2024

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16 171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 31st, 2026 03:50 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios