found in an attic
Feb. 9th, 2003 09:24 amI'm always intrigued by the notion of an attic full of things. My grandmother and grandfather had one of those cinematic attics, which had memorabilia from the past--books my grandfather read in high school, newspaper articles about family things, and various of the clothing items and such that don't get thrown out. This attic, though, was in an old home they moved from when I was a young teen, and I don't think that the attic in the home they moved to had any such ancient contrivance. I've been reading this morning about all the various things that people have found in an attic. One attic in California contained the original manuscript of the first half of Mark Twain's novel "Huckleberry Finn". An attic in Sweden held a thousand year old Viking sword, apparently dug up a generation or two ago, placed in an attic and forgotten.
An attic in the UK contained Queen Victoria's letters to the gamekeeper of whom she grew quite fond after the death of her husband (which perhaps should serve as a reminder about committing to paper/LJ things one does not wish uncovered in later generations). People have auctioned things at Sotheby's they found in an attic, but I am pretty sure my aunt's high school yearbook would not have made me rich.
I must admit that I have a bit of longing to sort through attics of old material. I like those little county historical museums which are nothing more than a collection of the attics of roughly ten people. I love the look of an old-time attic space--the kind in which actual walking areas are available for storage and mobility, unlike, say, our current attic in which only limited storage is possible because most of it is just insulation, not walkway.
I think the attraction for me of an attic is that connection to things passed. I wonder sometimes what earlier generations of my family thought. I'm fortunate, in that on my mother's side of the family,somebody wrote a rather detailed geneaology, and on my father's side of the family, there is a rich oral and written history of things family members said and did.
One bit of oral history always speaks to me. A number of my relatives fought in the American Civil War, in the 1860s. Most of them fought on the losing Confederate side, while a few fought on the Union side. One great-great-type relative participated in many of the bloody Tennessee campaign battles, horrendous affairs in which he obtained wounds. He told the story of being in a battle in which a line of Union troops was arrayed against a line of Confederate troops. Just before the battle began, a large rabbit ran between the lines. Both sides watched the rabbit head past the lines, retreating to safety. Finally, one of the soldiers shouted out "But for my honour, I'd run, too!", and both sides broke down in laughter. My uncle's Civil War pension records show he took three wounds at Shiloh. I wish everyone's honour had made it possible for that war to be avoided.
Another of my great-great-type relatives wrote his life story for his descendants to read. Like most of my relatives, he alternated between farming and working for the railroad, achieving no greatimportance in either field. His autobiography runs no more than two pages or so. It's a good general guide to what he did, but it does not really tell me what he felt, and how things seemed to him. I always marvel at people who lived one hundred years ago--no anti-biotics, life expectancies significantly shorter, no technology, outmoded social prejudices and more challenges in many ways. Yet many tend to think of those past times as uniformly charming and desirable. I am always intrigued by folks who argue for "good old days" during which a national economic emergency put people out of their homes, hungry, or for a time when "old time religion" tolerated lynchings of people in public exhibitions as a spectator sport. But the lure of the past is nonetheless unmistakable. I like my past in trunk-sized portions, in atticss in old homes, where everything can seem charming, outdated and utterly desirable.
An attic in the UK contained Queen Victoria's letters to the gamekeeper of whom she grew quite fond after the death of her husband (which perhaps should serve as a reminder about committing to paper/LJ things one does not wish uncovered in later generations). People have auctioned things at Sotheby's they found in an attic, but I am pretty sure my aunt's high school yearbook would not have made me rich.
I must admit that I have a bit of longing to sort through attics of old material. I like those little county historical museums which are nothing more than a collection of the attics of roughly ten people. I love the look of an old-time attic space--the kind in which actual walking areas are available for storage and mobility, unlike, say, our current attic in which only limited storage is possible because most of it is just insulation, not walkway.
I think the attraction for me of an attic is that connection to things passed. I wonder sometimes what earlier generations of my family thought. I'm fortunate, in that on my mother's side of the family,somebody wrote a rather detailed geneaology, and on my father's side of the family, there is a rich oral and written history of things family members said and did.
One bit of oral history always speaks to me. A number of my relatives fought in the American Civil War, in the 1860s. Most of them fought on the losing Confederate side, while a few fought on the Union side. One great-great-type relative participated in many of the bloody Tennessee campaign battles, horrendous affairs in which he obtained wounds. He told the story of being in a battle in which a line of Union troops was arrayed against a line of Confederate troops. Just before the battle began, a large rabbit ran between the lines. Both sides watched the rabbit head past the lines, retreating to safety. Finally, one of the soldiers shouted out "But for my honour, I'd run, too!", and both sides broke down in laughter. My uncle's Civil War pension records show he took three wounds at Shiloh. I wish everyone's honour had made it possible for that war to be avoided.
Another of my great-great-type relatives wrote his life story for his descendants to read. Like most of my relatives, he alternated between farming and working for the railroad, achieving no greatimportance in either field. His autobiography runs no more than two pages or so. It's a good general guide to what he did, but it does not really tell me what he felt, and how things seemed to him. I always marvel at people who lived one hundred years ago--no anti-biotics, life expectancies significantly shorter, no technology, outmoded social prejudices and more challenges in many ways. Yet many tend to think of those past times as uniformly charming and desirable. I am always intrigued by folks who argue for "good old days" during which a national economic emergency put people out of their homes, hungry, or for a time when "old time religion" tolerated lynchings of people in public exhibitions as a spectator sport. But the lure of the past is nonetheless unmistakable. I like my past in trunk-sized portions, in atticss in old homes, where everything can seem charming, outdated and utterly desirable.
no subject
Date: 2003-02-09 08:08 am (UTC)....one of the saddest things about moving around so much is not having an accumulation of 'stuff', gathered over the years. The longest I've ever lived in the same place is 3 years (my current place), otherwise, a year or less is typical.
One day, I'm sure i'll settle for good (what ever that means).
no subject
Date: 2003-02-09 08:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-02-09 10:41 am (UTC)perhaps that's my fascination with attics and things kept, all and everything kept
my mother threw me out at 17 along with everything i'd kept
she also gave away all our toys and most of our books
she does not have an attachment to the past at all
when my father began helping King Burke, the elderly next door neighbor who eventually died and his house was opened to the world in that massive estate sale last year, clean out the enormous and jammed full of treasures basement i begged him to let me know when they would address the attic
supposedly there were 4 generations of the belongings and such up there
King died before that ever happened and it was only on the third day of the estate sale that my friend Pomegranate and i ventured up there
thrashed and trashed, there were still boxes of personal mementos and gradeschool and college accomplishments, photos, pictures and paintings
i am attracted to stories and tales of people's lives so these old and often un-treasured are laden with soul and sentiment
what was wasn't picked up at the estate sale was launched from on high into the most enormous portable dumpster i ever saw
not that attic and it's sheltered stories are being prepared to be the Historical Society's Showcase Home this coming April....everything it was gutted and some sheeshee designer will attempt to make a dramatic impression on other designers and their adoring crowds
i've got a cardboard box of the Burke family ...ashes to ashes, paper to paper turned into art
no subject
Date: 2003-02-09 06:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-02-09 08:19 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2003-02-10 09:10 am (UTC)it still feels that way as i look out my window and see the yard stripped clear and the trees cut down and any remnants of a century worth of family history evaporate
no subject
Date: 2003-02-09 11:18 am (UTC)That is the main reason I keep a paper journal- I think it would be infinitely interesting to touch the pages someone else had written on and put together.
Several years ago, my mema (grandmother) brought me a flour sack full of stuff she had saved from my great-grandfather's house. She had gone through it already, looking at everything. But she brought all the treasures to me. There were about 30 years worth of receipts from where my great-great grandfather had paid taxes, receipts for items he had purchased, the funeral books for the great great grandfather and grandmother. The best piece, tucked into an envelope, was the original land grant, dated 1792, for the family land, signed by the governor of South Carolina. If she hadn't grabbed the bag, all of that memorabilia would have been lost.
Everything's worth something to someone. You just have to figure out who's going to keep it.
no subject
Date: 2003-02-09 06:33 pm (UTC)cinematic attics
Date: 2003-02-09 12:13 pm (UTC)I have an especial interest in attics because 1) my grandmother had a massive attic that was absolutely forbidden to enter. And then after her death the majority of its contents were disposed of.
2) my immediate family/myself have never had our own attic space. (only crawl spaces: ick)
Re: cinematic attics
Date: 2003-02-09 06:37 pm (UTC)To adopt the metaphor, I worry that we all treat traditions as "crawl space", and fail to pass down what was "real", leaving it to the media culture to fabricate traditions we "should" experience, instead of forming more meaningful ones. Although I love Christmas, for example, I suspect that Christmas is a media-driven inauthentic thing for lots of people, who should instead be sharing other things about family bonding and finding oneself.
But thanks for the idea. This sort of great idea is why I solicit the post topics.
no subject
Date: 2003-02-09 03:07 pm (UTC)I've been going through trunks in my parents house each time I visit. My father was an accumulator. I have most of 11 years of Saturday evening post (from 1946 to 1957) which survived on the floor of their storage area. But I'm giving them away or distributing them. How can I cope with more paper? I have so much.
I love looking at the photos, though - and hearing the stories.
no subject
Date: 2003-02-09 06:39 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2003-02-10 06:02 pm (UTC)I have a tendancy to recyle *stuff* rather than paper. The idea of trashing books is not a happy one.
no subject
Date: 2003-02-09 11:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-02-10 04:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-02-10 11:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-02-10 05:50 am (UTC)Your post resurfaced that bittersweet memory. Thanks. :)
no subject
Date: 2003-02-10 07:17 am (UTC)